• Home
    • APSA Public Statements
    • APSA Annual Meeting
    • 2024 US Elections
    • APSA Website
  • Journals
    • American Political Science Review
    • PS: Political Science & Politics
    • Perspectives on Politics
    • Journal of Political Science Education
    • Political Science Today
    • Public Scholars
    • Cambridge University Press
    • All Journals
  • Awards
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Centennial Center
    • Grants
  • People
    • Political Science Scholars
    • Career Paths
    • Member Spotlight ★
    • Obituaries
  • Diversity & Inclusion
    • APSA Oral History Project
    • Ralph Bunche Summer Institute
    • Diversity Fellowship Program
    • Fund for Latino Scholarship
    • First-Generation Scholars
  • Teaching
    • APSA Educate
    • Teaching Conference
    • Webinars
    • Workshops
    • Public Engagement
  • Tell Us Your Story!
Latest News
  • [ April 13, 2026 ] Working Group Travel Grant Available: “Reimaging Accessibility within the Discipline” | Deadline: May 15, 2026 APSA Annual Meeting
  • [ April 13, 2026 ] What Am I Reading? How Teaching Genre Improves Civic Skills Journals
  • [ April 10, 2026 ] Update on Proposed Dissolution of SBE Directorate at the National Science Foundation (NSF) Advocacy
  • [ April 10, 2026 ] When Gangs Fill the Gap Left by the State Journals
  • [ April 10, 2026 ] What Would Mearsheimer Do? Reviewing Mearsheimer.ai as a Teaching Tool for International Relations Journals
  • [ April 9, 2026 ] Round-Up: APSA Advocacy Updates, Opportunities, and Events in Washington Advocacy
Home2020 ElectionsUtah’s 2020 Presidential Primary

Utah’s 2020 Presidential Primary

February 21, 2020 2020 Elections, Civic Education, Civic Engagement, RAISE the Vote Comments Off on Utah’s 2020 Presidential Primary

Utah is one of a handful of states seeking to increase its visibility in presidential politics by moving its primary date to “Super Tuesday” (March 3, 2020). States often seek to increase their prominence in the presidential nomination process by moving the date of the state’s primary as early as possible, a tactic known as “frontloading.” States are, however, constrained by the rules of the two major parties which have allowed Iowa and New Hampshire to maintain their first in the nation status. In the 2020 primary contests, Utah joins 13 other states (Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, and Virginia) and the territory of American Samoa in selecting its delegates for the national party conventions on Super Tuesday. Given recent changes to the timing and procedures of the Utah presidential primary, it will be interesting to see how the state fares on Super Tuesday.

Utah has traditionally been one of the states that voted later in the primary season and thus had little impact in the competition for candidate and media attention.

This is not surprising, as Utah is a relatively small western state and has not historically been a battleground state in presidential elections. Unlike Colorado and Nevada, which have gained attention in recent presidential contests because of their competitiveness, Utah has voted consistently for Republican candidates. The last time a Democratic presidential candidate carried the state was Lyndon Johnson in 1964.

Thus, it was a bit of surprise when the Utah legislature agreed to fund a presidential primary and hold it on Super Tuesday. The legislature’s decision was in part a reaction to what happened in the state during the 2016 primary election (Davidson 2019; Roche 2019). In 2016, the state legislature chose not to fund a primary election and left the task to the state political parties. The Utah Democratic and Republican parties opted to hold caucus meetings to determine their convention delegates, although the Utah Republican party experimented with allowing registered voters who could not attend the caucus meeting to vote online for their preferred presidential candidate (technical problems, however, kept the online vote from being a success). Republican caucus voters in 2016 supported Senator Ted Cruz who was awarded all 40 of the state’s Republican delegates (followed in the voting by Governor John Kasich and Donald Trump). On the Democratic side, caucus attendees voted heavily for Bernie Sanders with Hillary Clinton finishing a distance second.

This is not surprising, as Utah is a relatively small western state and has not historically been a battleground state in presidential elections.

It is worth noting that Utah law allows the political parties to decide whether to hold an open or closed primary. Republicans, being the dominant party in the state, have opted for a closed primary, meaning that a voter must be registered as a Republican in order to participate in the Republican party’s selection process. Democrats use an open primary process meaning that anyone who is registered either as a Democrat or an unaffiliated voter may opt to participate in the Democratic primary. In 2016, caucus attendees were faced with long lines and a shortage of paper ballots at some caucus sites when a much larger than expected number of voters, many of whom were unaffiliated, attended the Democratic caucuses to support Sanders. Democratic party organizers printed 65,000 ballots for the meetings and had to print 15,000 more to accommodate the swell of support from the Sanders voters (Romboy 2016).

Since the 2020 primaries in Utah will be conducted as a state election rather than run by the parties as they were in 2016, the election will largely be held by mail ballot. The rules for who can vote in the mail primary follow those specified by the two major parties. All registered Republicans will be sent a Republican primary ballot. As the incumbent, President Trump faces only token opposition for the party’s nomination in Utah. Registered Democrats, and unaffiliated voters who opt in, will be sent the Democrat primary ballot. The Democratic ballot includes, among others, frontrunners Joe Biden, Pete Buttigieg, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren, as well as Michael Bloomberg, the billionaire former Republican mayor of New York City. Bloomberg was a late entry into the Democratic nomination contest and missed the early Democratic debates and chose not to compete in the four early state contests. Bloomberg’s campaign seeks to do well enough in the Super Tuesday states to win delegates and become a contender for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Since the 2020 primaries in Utah will be conducted as a state election rather than run by the parties as they were in 2016, the election will largely be held by mail ballot.

Bloomberg’s unorthodox campaign for the Democratic nomination – skipping the traditional four early states and banking on doing well on Super Tuesday – is not unlike Utah’s long-shot efforts to attract attention from the presidential candidates by moving its primary to Super Tuesday. Will Utah be successful in competing for the attention of presidential candidates? Given that large states like California and Texas and important swing states like Colorado, North Carolina, and Virginia are also voting on Super Tuesday, it seems unlikely. Still, the state’s move to Super Tuesday has helped to generate visits from candidates such as Michael Bloomberg, Joe Biden, Julián Castro, and Elizabeth Warren. With a little luck, Utah’s effort to make itself more prominent in the selection of party nominees could pay off.


References

Davidson, Lee. 2019. “After chaos in Utah’s last presidential caucuses, bill advances to replace them with a Super Tuesday primary.” Salt Lake Tribune, March 8.

Roche, Lisa Riley. 2019. “Utah Dems cheer Super Tuesday primary.” Deseret News, March 24.

Romboy, Dennis. 2016. “Final tally: Sanders wins 29 delegates in Utah caucus.” Deseret News, March 31.

Matthew Burbank is a guest contributor for the RAISE the Vote Campaign. The views expressed in the posts and articles featured in the RAISE the Vote campaign are those of the authors and contributors alone and do not represent the views of APSA.

Matthew Burbank is a professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Utah where he teaches classes on voting, public opinion, political parties, and research methods. He is the author of two books, Parties, Interest Groups, and Political Campaigns with Ronald Hrebenar and Robert Benedict (Oxford University Press, 2012) and Olympic Dreams: The Impact of Mega-events on Local Politics with Greg Andranovich and Charles Heying (Lynne Rienner Press, 2001), as well as a number of journal articles and book chapters.

  • Bernie Sanders
  • Democrat
  • Donald Trump
  • Elizabeth Warren
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Joe Biden
  • John Kasich
  • Julian Castro
  • Lyndon Johnson
  • Michael Bloomberg
  • Pete Buttigieg
  • Super Tuesday
  • Ted Cruz
  • Utah
Previous

Getting out the Vote in the Valley: Connecting Politics and Participation to Youth

Next

John Ishiyama Receives the University of North Texas Foundation’s Eminent Faculty Award

Related Articles

2020 Elections

The Illinois 2020 Primary: It’s All about the General Assembly

January 22, 2020 2020 Elections, Civic Education, Civic Engagement, RAISE the Vote Comments Off on The Illinois 2020 Primary: It’s All about the General Assembly

Christopher Z. Mooney, W. Russell Arrington Professor of State Politics at  the University of Illinois, Chicago, is a guest contributor for the RAISE the Vote Campaign. The views expressed in the posts and articles featured […]

2020 Elections

Engaging Student Voters in Pennsylvania

April 7, 2020 2020 Elections, Civic Education, Civic Engagement, RAISE the Vote, Student Voting Comments Off on Engaging Student Voters in Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania’s primary elections will be held on Tuesday, April 28. In comparison to the early caucuses and primaries in Iowa, New Hampshire, and on Super Tuesday, this feels like a late and potentially inconsequential date […]

Civic Education

Climate Change and Populist Democracy

December 17, 2019 Civic Education, Civic Engagement, Climate Change, Political Theory, RAISE the Vote, Voter Education and Engagement Comments Off on Climate Change and Populist Democracy

Gregory Koutnik, a PhD candidate studying political theory at the University of Pennsylvania,is a guest contributor for the RAISE the Vote Campaign. The views expressed in the posts and articles featured in the RAISE the […]

Follow Us

  • X
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Recent Posts

  • Working Group Travel Grant Available: “Reimaging Accessibility within the Discipline” | Deadline: May 15, 2026
  • What Am I Reading? How Teaching Genre Improves Civic Skills
  • Update on Proposed Dissolution of SBE Directorate at the National Science Foundation (NSF)
  • When Gangs Fill the Gap Left by the State
  • What Would Mearsheimer Do? Reviewing Mearsheimer.ai as a Teaching Tool for International Relations

Journals

  • What Am I Reading? How Teaching Genre Improves Civic Skills

    April 13, 2026 0
    What Am I Reading? How Teaching Genre Improves Civic Skills By Katherine Knutson and Rachel Flynn, Gustavus Adolphus College Students encounter information in myriad ways, making it difficult to discern what they are reading and [...]
  • When Gangs Fill the Gap Left by the State

    April 10, 2026 0
    In the APSA Public Scholarship Program, graduate students in political science produce summaries of new research in the American Political Science Review. This piece, written by Ximena Caló, covers the new article by Bruno Pantaleão, [...]
  • What Would Mearsheimer Do? Reviewing Mearsheimer.ai as a Teaching Tool for International Relations

    April 10, 2026 0
    What Would Mearsheimer Do? Reviewing Mearsheimer.ai as a Teaching Tool for International Relations By Mateus Bilhar, Tsinghua University and Richard J. Cook, Nankai University Mearsheimer.ai is a curated chatbot that allows users to interact with [...]

Copyright © I American Political Science Association

360640706
 

Loading Comments...