• Home
  • Journals
    • American Political Science Review
    • Perspectives on Politics
    • PS: Political Science & Politics
    • Journal of Political Science Education
    • All Journals
  • Awards
  • Career Paths
  • People
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Teaching
    • APSA Educate
  • Tell Us Your Story!
News
  • [ January 26, 2021 ] Meet Mariana Carvalho, 2020 APSA Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grantee Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grant
  • [ January 25, 2021 ] Meet Kiela Crabtree, 2020 APSA Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grantee Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grant
  • [ January 22, 2021 ] Meet the 2021-2022 APSA Diversity Fellowship Program Fellows (Fall) Diversity & Inclusion
HomeCivic EducationClimate Change and Populist Democracy

Climate Change and Populist Democracy

December 17, 2019 Civic Education, Civic Engagement, Climate Change, Political Theory, RAISE the Vote, Voter Education and Engagement Comments Off on Climate Change and Populist Democracy

Gregory Koutnik, a PhD candidate studying political theory at the University of Pennsylvania,is a guest contributor for the RAISE the Vote Campaign. The views expressed in the posts and articles featured in the RAISE the Vote campaign are those of the authors and contributors alone and do not represent the views of APSA.

As global temperatures and sea levels rise, so too does the need for democratic demands for climate action. American history is punctuated by periods of popular agitation that alter the balance of political power and make possible what had been impossible reforms. Is America capable of such a period of democratic reform? Are we experiencing one now? If so, will our populist moment enable decisive action on climate change? Or will it reinforce inaction?

The urgency of such questions could hardly be greater.

Last year’s United Nations IPCC report warns that avoiding the most catastrophic effects of climate change will “require rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society.” The report also points to the “clear benefits to people and natural ecosystems” that come with “a more sustainable and equitable society.” According to the Stanford Political Psychology Research Group, robust majorities of the American people have consistently viewed climate change as real, as driven by human activity, and as a threat to the country and to the world. Yet the United States is currently in the process of pulling out of the Paris Climate Accords, and both political parties have largely failed to adopt reforms that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions at the pace required to avert the worst effects of climate change.

But if climate change is such a problem, and if the public largely agrees, then why has more decisive action not been taken in the United States?

A number of factors are likely at play, including partisan polarization at home and the difficulties of negotiating binding global climate agreements abroad when the short-term costs and benefits of climate action vary around the world. Moreover, industries that have a financial interest in maintaining a carbon-intensive economy resist efforts toward decisive climate action and even sow doubt about climate science, just as tobacco companies did about the health risks of smoking a few generations ago.

All of these factors, I argue, make democratic engagement on the issue of climate change especially important. Moreover, simply increasing voter participation is likely not enough, because, as John Meyer has argued, environmental problems suffer from a “resonance dilemma” in which the public recognizes the issue but politicians do not prioritize it—in large part because they do not see the issue as a high priority for the public. Civic participation means more than getting out the vote. It also means embracing modes of participation and agitation—such as movement-building, protesting, and building new democratic institutions—that make climate change a top political priority. The only alternative, as political theorists like William Ophuls have pointed out, is rule by experts who have the power to assert their will against any and all opposition.[1] Rather than putting our trust in ecological philosopher-kings, I suggest that we look to a perhaps unlikely source of inspiration—the populist tradition in American politics.

Scholars have defined “populism” in many different ways, though there is general agreement that populists conceive of politics as a struggle between ordinary people and corrupt or oblivious elites in power.

As historian Michael Kazin has shown, populism appears throughout American history and across the political spectrum, from the farmer-labor populists of the late 19th-century (for whom the term “populist” was coined) to the labor activists of the New Deal to the conservative activists who fueled the Reagan Revolution. It is no wonder, then, that contemporary politicians as wide-ranging as Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Mike Huckabee, and Donald Trump have all been described by that label, or even have consciously adopted it themselves.

Paying attention to populist politics allows us to see the moments in American political history in which popular opinion and grievances translated into civic engagement that extended beyond voting, including concerted efforts to reorient the priorities of the two major parties—or even create a third party, as the original populists attempted to do. Given the political inertia surrounding the issue of climate change, perhaps what is needed is a populist resurgence that will fuel civic engagement and make decisive democratic climate action possible.

Civic participation means more than getting out the vote. It also means embracing modes of participation and agitation—such as movement-building, protesting, and building new democratic institutions—that make climate change a top political priority.

Needless to say, populism does not automatically translate into climate action. Populism can cut both ways. Important research by Kathy Cramer and Arlie Hochschild suggests that populist appeals can also be made by opponents of environmental policies, especially when rural voters view these policies as a threat to their economic wellbeing. Indeed, this is arguably what has happened recently in France with the “Yellow Vest” protests and in Washington State with the failure of Initiative 1631. In both cases, carbon taxes designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions met popular opposition in large part because many saw the burdens of the carbon tax as unfairly concentrated on those trying to make ends meet. This suggests that climate policy must take into account issues of equity and environmental justice. But it also suggests that smart policies and scientific expertise are not enough to jumpstart the politics of climate change. Civic engagement is, in itself, a necessary component of any politically sustainable solution. Rather than creating technocratic fixes that may not address the needs of everyday people, climate action requires robust democratic participation, both to get off the ground and to maintain the popular support necessary to succeed.

There are no guarantees in a democracy.

Democratic majorities can mobilize for or against the policies and principles one desires. But the environmental problems of our time, including climate change, cannot be addressed without the kind of robust civic engagement that characterizes the populist moments in our nation’s political history. Whatever happens in 2020 and beyond, history will surely judge us in part on whether our nation succeeded in tapping into its populist strength to make democracy work for everyday people and for future generations who will inherit the earth we leave for them. Civic engagement and political participation are the surest means to make that happen.


[1] William Ophuls, Ecology and the Politics of Scarcity: Prologue to a Political Theory of the Steady State, W.H. Freeman, 1977.

Gregory Koutnik is a PhD candidate studying political theory at the University of Pennsylvania. His research explores the politics of ecological belonging with special attention to issues of property, environmental stewardship, place-based attachments, and populist politics. He is a former graduate fellow at the Andrea Mitchell Center for the Study of Democracy and the Penn Program in the Environmental Humanities.

 

  • American Politics
  • Bernie Sanders
  • Climate Change
  • Donald Trump
  • Elizabeth Warren
  • John Meyer
  • Mike Huckabee
  • Paris Climate Accords
  • Stanford Political Psychology Research Group
  • United Nations IPCC
  • University of Pennsylvania
Previous

2020 APSA RBSI Applications Due January 17th – Meet RBSI Scholar Ignangeli Salinas-Muniz

Next

APSA Co-sponsors Workshop on Teaching Religion and Humanitarianism in Nairobi

Related Articles

2020 Elections

A Look at the 2020 Primary Elections in the US Virgin Islands

January 28, 2020 2020 Elections, Civic Education, RAISE the Vote Comments Off on A Look at the 2020 Primary Elections in the US Virgin Islands

Malik Sekou, professor of political science and history at the University of the Virgin Islands, is a guest contributor for the RAISE the Vote Campaign. The views expressed in the posts and articles featured in […]

2020 Elections

Taking Students to the Iowa Caucus: An Experiential Approach to American Politics

January 16, 2020 2020 Elections, Civic Engagement, Election, RAISE the Vote, Students Comments Off on Taking Students to the Iowa Caucus: An Experiential Approach to American Politics

Phillip Ardoin, Professor of Political Science at Appalachian State University, is a guest contributor for the RAISE the Vote Campaign. The views expressed in the posts and articles featured in the RAISE the Vote campaign […]

2020 Elections

Utah’s 2020 Presidential Primary

February 21, 2020 2020 Elections, Civic Education, Civic Engagement, RAISE the Vote Comments Off on Utah’s 2020 Presidential Primary

Utah is one of a handful of states seeking to increase its visibility in presidential politics by moving its primary date to “Super Tuesday” (March 3, 2020). States often seek to increase their prominence in […]

Follow Us

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

The Democracy 2020 Project

  • Call for Submissions: Undergraduate Poll Worker Essay Contest

    November 9, 2020 0
    Undergraduate Poll Worker Essay Contest The American Political Science Association’s (APSA) Electoral Assistance Task Force invites students who served as election workers in polling places to submit brief essays reflecting on the experience.  In preparing [...]
  • APSA Educate Call for Materials: “Teaching the 2020 U.S. Election”

    November 5, 2020 0
    The 2020 U.S. election presents unique challenges and opportunities for political science students and educators. In response, the American Political Science Association is seeking teaching resources focused on the 2020 U.S. election, the presidential transition, and the incoming Biden-Harris administration to be featured on Educate – APSA’s new [...]
  • What You Should Know about Election and Voter Fraud

    November 2, 2020 0
    What You Should Know about Election and Voter Fraud The purpose of the APSA Election Assistance Task Force is to foster broader knowledge and understanding of non-partisan election assistance, including resources on non-partisan voter mobilization organizations, [...]

Recent Posts

  • Meet Mariana Carvalho, 2020 APSA Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grantee
  • Meet Kiela Crabtree, 2020 APSA Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grantee
  • Meet the 2021-2022 APSA Diversity Fellowship Program Fellows (Fall)

FOLLOW @APSATweets

My Tweets

Copyright © 2018 I American Political Science Association

Read previous post:
2020 APSA RBSI Applications Due January 17th – Meet RBSI Scholar Ignangeli Salinas-Muniz

Apply for the 2020 Ralph Bunche Summer Institute (RBSI) by January 17th Ignangeli Salinas-Muniz is a political science major and...

Close