• Home
    • APSA Public Statements
    • APSA Annual Meeting
    • 2024 US Elections
    • APSA Website
  • Journals
    • American Political Science Review
    • PS: Political Science & Politics
    • Perspectives on Politics
    • Journal of Political Science Education
    • Political Science Today
    • Public Scholars
    • Cambridge University Press
    • All Journals
  • Awards
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Centennial Center
    • Grants
  • People
    • Political Science Scholars
    • Career Paths
    • Member Spotlight ★
    • Obituaries
  • Diversity & Inclusion
    • APSA Oral History Project
    • Ralph Bunche Summer Institute
    • Diversity Fellowship Program
    • Fund for Latino Scholarship
    • First-Generation Scholars
  • Teaching
    • APSA Educate
    • Teaching Conference
    • Webinars
    • Workshops
    • Public Engagement
  • Tell Us Your Story!
Latest News
  • [ April 23, 2026 ] Land, Power, and Property Rights: The Political Economy of Land Titling in Sub-Saharan Africa American Political Science Review
  • [ April 23, 2026 ] Meet 2026 RBSI Scholar, Mohamed Aljahmi, CUNY Queens College Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • [ April 23, 2026 ] Structure, Agency, and Structural Reform: The Case of the European Central Bank Journals
  • [ April 22, 2026 ] Demographics of the Profession: APSA Membership | APSA Data on the Profession APSA
  • [ April 22, 2026 ] Meet 2026 RBSI Scholar, Yesli Aguilar, Texas A&M University Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • [ April 22, 2026 ] The Symbolic Politics of Status in the MAGA Movement Journals
Home2020 ElectionsThe Curious Case of Guam: The Unincorporated Territory’s Role in the 2020 Primaries

The Curious Case of Guam: The Unincorporated Territory’s Role in the 2020 Primaries

February 18, 2020 2020 Elections, Civic Education, Civic Engagement, RAISE the Vote Comments Off on The Curious Case of Guam: The Unincorporated Territory’s Role in the 2020 Primaries

Guam, the southernmost island of the Mariåna island chain, is an unincorporated territory of the United States. Guam is home to approximately 160,000 people and its native, indigenous people are known as the CHamoru. Although Guam’s residents are citizens of the US, they do not vote for president nor do they have any real representation at the national level, aside from a non-voting House delegate. The Organic Act of Guam, which ended naval rule and implemented measures of self-government, established the island’s local government after WWII. These measures include a 15-seat legislature, whose representatives are elected at-large and serve two-year terms, an executive branch with a Governor and Lieutenant Governor, and an independent judicial branch. Guam’s territorial status shapes both the way in which the island participates in the presidential election and the issues that are relevant to its voters.

On the island there are two main political parties: the Republican Party and the Democratic Party. Although these parties greatly resemble their national counterparts, they do not entirely mirror them. In interviews with the author, chairs of each party observed that though both parties share the agenda of the respective national parties, slight ideological differences distinguish Guam’s political parties from their national equivalents.[1] For example, a 2018 bill to raise the business privilege tax by 25% received yes-votes from 5 out of 6 Republican senators, and no-votes from 6 out of 9 Democratic senators. However, history shows that the people of Guam have placed less focus on party affiliation or ideology and instead pay more attention to the individual characteristics or familial ties of a particular political candidate. Local Republican party chair, Jerry Crisostomo, explained in a personal interview that Guam’s political environment is not necessarily philosophically-driven or issue-driven. Instead, it is driven by “who’s running and how well they’re known” as well as “what they have to offer to make life better for the average citizen.” Former Democratic party chair, Judith Won Pat, in a personal interview, also echoed those sentiments, stating “people want to know their candidates, they want to be able to rub shoulders with them, to approach them no matter where they are.” This personal approach to politics is of course enabled by the island’s relatively small geographic size, population, and strong sense of local culture.

Just as the local party-system resembles that of the United States, so too does the presidential primary process, which is separate from the local senatorial and gubernatorial primaries. Although the island does not have electors who vote for President, both the Democrat and Republican national parties allow the territory to participate in the selection of the party’s presidential candidate by sending locally-elected representatives to their respective national conventions.

The Republican party, which evolved from the Territorial Party, officially received its charter in 1968 and was primarily made up of the island’s businessmen, many of whose families remain prominent in politics on Guam today. At the national convention, Guam is allotted a total of nine delegates, six of whom are elected and three automatic seats for party leaders (National Committeeman, National Committeewoman, & Party Chair). At the local biennial convention which will be on March 14th this year, local delegates from the island’s 19 villages, who are elected by registered Republicans in their respective villages, elect these delegates and party leaders. Traditionally, the party allocated votes proportionally among candidates to “cover all its bases,” but this year, the party has already decided to cast all of its votes in support of President Trump, who also received all nine delegate votes in 2016. [2]

For the Democratic party, originally the Popular Party, the primary process differs slightly. Guam sends a total of 12 delegates to the Democratic National Convention, with seven being elected at-large by Democrat voters and five automatic seats for party leaders (National Committeeman, National Committeewoman, Party Chair, Party Vice-Chair, and the non-voting House delegate). Delegates are elected by registered Democrats at an at-large election held by the local party in Hagåtña, the island’s capital. Delegate votes are allocated to candidates in proportion to their share of votes, subject to the party’s standard 15% threshold.[3] This year’s caucus is tentatively set for May 2nd. In the 2016 primary, Hillary Clinton received seven out of twelve elected delegate votes from Guam.[4]

During Guam’s local general elections in November, residents also participate in a straw poll for the US presidency. Since 1984, this unofficial vote has accurately predicted the outcome of the national presidential election, except in 2016.[5]  Despite the lack of real participation in national elections, there is still increasing political interest and civic engagement.  Several local organizations have recently taken charge by bringing issues closer to the youth and making politics more accessible. These organizations include the Young Democrats of Guam, the youth wing of the Democrat party, which aims to increase awareness about how political issues affect young people and to empower and magnify the youth vote, as well as university student organizations such as the Political Science Student Association, which promotes student involvement in politics.

The island’s unresolved political status, however, remains the greatest obstacle to solving the many socio-economic problems that plague its people, including high levels of poverty, a high cost of living, and an increasing crime rate. As Crisostomo stated, the Republican party recognizes that “decolonization is needed and at the end of the day the relationship between Guam and the US needs to be truly defined going forward, as many issues are because of the current status we’re in.”[6] The multi-faceted issue continues to make its way to the forefront of island politics. As Won Pat describes, “now that more of us are educated, learning about what’s going on in the world, learning that we have certain rights, learning that things can be better for us, we’re asking ourselves why we can’t make that decision.”[7] Nevertheless, more work must be done to make the issue of decolonization one of importance to ordinary citizens. The island’s lack of any meaningful vote in this year’s high-stakes presidential election is a clear reminder of the need for a change in political status for the people of Guam.


Nolan G.T. Flores is a guest contributor for the RAISE the Vote Campaign. The views expressed in the posts and articles featured in the RAISE the Vote campaign are those of the authors and contributors alone and do not represent the views of APSA.

Nolan G.T. Flores is a second-year undergraduate student at the University of Guam, currently pursuing a double B.A. in Political Science and CHamoru Studies. He is a member of the Guam Youth Congress, the island’s youth law-making body, and serves on the Board of Directors for the island’s government library system. Nolan is currently involved in several grant research projects, including a self-governance study by the island’s Commission on Decolonization and the Developing CHamoru Language Infrastructure grant from the National Science Foundation. His research interests involve furthering Guam’s quest for self-determination, revitalizing the CHamoru culture and language, and contributing to the growth and prosperity of Micronesia and the Pacific.

[1] Jerry Crisostomo, interview by author, Hagåtña, Guam, January 13, 2020.; Judith Won Pat, interview by author, Tiyan, Guam, January 15, 2020.

[2] Crisostomo, interview.; Cable News Network (CNN), Election 2016, 2016, accessed January 30, 2020. https://edition.cnn.com/election/2016/primaries/states/gu/Dem.

[3] Won Pat, interview.

[4] CNN, Election 2016.

[5] Michael Bevacqua, “Bevacqua: why Guam’s worthless straw poll matters,” Pacific Daily News, November 17, 2016, accessed January 26, 2020, https://www.guampdn.com/story/opinion/columnists/2016/11/17/bevacqua-why-guams-worthless-straw-poll-matters/93950058/.

[6] Crisostomo, interview.

[7] Won Pat, interview.

  • Democratic National Convention
  • Democratic Party
  • Donald Trump
  • Guam primaries
  • Hagåtña
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Jerry Crisostomo
  • Judith Won Pat
  • Organic Act of Guam
  • Political Science Student Association
  • Popular Party
  • Republican Party
  • Territorial Party
  • WWII
  • Young Democrats of Guam
Previous

APSA Spring 2020 Minority Fellowship Program — Applications due March 20th

Next

2019 Giving by the Numbers in Support of Political Science

Related Articles

2020 Elections

Utah’s 2020 Presidential Primary

February 21, 2020 2020 Elections, Civic Education, Civic Engagement, RAISE the Vote Comments Off on Utah’s 2020 Presidential Primary

Utah is one of a handful of states seeking to increase its visibility in presidential politics by moving its primary date to “Super Tuesday” (March 3, 2020). States often seek to increase their prominence in […]

2020 Elections

2020 Election in Alabama: What is at stake, what to expect?

February 5, 2020 2020 Elections, Civic Engagement, Democratic Engagement, RAISE the Vote 1

The Iowa Caucus and New Hampshire primary mark the official beginning of the 2020 election season, though campaigning has been going on for a full year before the first primary votes were cast. Below, I […]

2020 Elections

Presidential Primaries and the Caucus/Convention System in Minnesota, 2020

January 23, 2020 2020 Elections, Civic Education, RAISE the Vote Comments Off on Presidential Primaries and the Caucus/Convention System in Minnesota, 2020

Tony Hill, Professor at Franklin Pierce University, is a guest contributor for the RAISE the Vote Campaign. The views expressed in the posts and articles featured in the RAISE the Vote campaign are those of […]

Follow Us

  • X
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Recent Posts

  • Land, Power, and Property Rights: The Political Economy of Land Titling in Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Meet 2026 RBSI Scholar, Mohamed Aljahmi, CUNY Queens College
  • Structure, Agency, and Structural Reform: The Case of the European Central Bank
  • Demographics of the Profession: APSA Membership | APSA Data on the Profession
  • Meet 2026 RBSI Scholar, Yesli Aguilar, Texas A&M University

Journals

  • Land, Power, and Property Rights: The Political Economy of Land Titling in Sub-Saharan Africa

    April 23, 2026 0
    Land, Power, and Property Rights: The Political Economy of Land Titling in Sub-Saharan Africa By Matthew K. Ribar, Stanford University Only 15% of African households possess a formal title for their agricultural land, despite the [...]
  • Structure, Agency, and Structural Reform: The Case of the European Central Bank

    April 23, 2026 0
    Structure, Agency, and Structural Reform: The Case of the European Central Bank By Benjamin Braun, London School of Economics and Political Science, Donato Di Carlo, The London School of Economics and Political Science, Sebastian Diessner, [...]
  • The Symbolic Politics of Status in the MAGA Movement

    April 22, 2026 0
    The Symbolic Politics of Status in the MAGA Movement By Biko Koenig, Franklin & Marshall College and Tali Mendelberg, Princeton University Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork among Make America Great Again (MAGA) activists during the 2020 [...]

Copyright © I American Political Science Association

360640706
 

Loading Comments...