• Home
  • Journals
    • American Political Science Review
    • Perspectives on Politics
    • PS: Political Science & Politics
    • Journal of Political Science Education
    • All Journals
  • Awards
  • Career Paths
  • People
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Teaching
    • APSA Educate
  • Tell Us Your Story!
News
  • [ July 1, 2022 ] Undergraduates in New Hampshire for the First-in-the-Nation Primary Journals
  • [ July 1, 2022 ] Meet DFP Spring Fellow, Laura Uribe, University of California, San Diego Diversity Fellowship Program
  • [ July 1, 2022 ] Theme Panel: Considering the Place of Disability in Political Science in the Wake of COVID-19 Annual Conference
HomeTeachingChapter 4: Conceptualizing Civic Education and Engagement in Less Liberal Contexts

Chapter 4: Conceptualizing Civic Education and Engagement in Less Liberal Contexts

November 26, 2021 Teaching, Teaching and Learning, Teaching Civic Engagement Comments Off on Chapter 4: Conceptualizing Civic Education and Engagement in Less Liberal Contexts
Teaching Civic Engagement Globally is the result of collaborative work spanning scholars from multiple disciplines, fields, and careers. Political scientists, educators, and students have joined to produce important, timely research.

Chapter 4: Conceptualizing Civic Education and Engagement in Less Liberal Contexts

by Catherine Shea Sanger, Yale-NUS College, Singapore, and Wei Lit Yew, Hong Kong Baptist University

Civic engagement education has often been associated with promoting and protecting liberal democracy. What does civic engagement education entail in less liberal or illiberal political contexts? In our contributions, we describe ways that broader political-legal contexts of the state and nation, organizational contexts of universities or colleges, and localized settings within the college, e.g., residential halls and classrooms (microclimates) combine to facilitate or stymie civic engagement education. Using Singapore as an illustration, we describe formal legal restrictions and implicit norms that constitute barriers to certain types of civic engagement.

To foster productive microclimates for civic education in this context, we encourage educators to emphasize community engagement in addition to political activism, inquiry and service over confrontational change-making, and communitarian/ collectivist over exclusively liberal/individualized political approaches. To develop these claims, we introduce a case study of Yale-NUS College in Singapore.

Our case study indicates that, through the provision of a facilitative campus climate, there are robust opportunities for civic engagement education in less liberal contexts. Our findings indicate that that the liberal arts and sciences common curriculum, active learning pedagogies, intimacy and multinationalism of the college community, support for student initiatives, and can-do culture of Yale-NUS have combined to nourish vibrant spaces for student civic engagement. However, there remain barriers to civic engagement. These include students’ workload and major selection, perceived liberal bias in the college, national political regulations, and the intimacy of the college community, which can be a double-edged sword. relations to empower the voices of many.

Read the full chapter here.


About Teaching Civic Engagement Globally
Educators around the globe are facing challenges in teaching politics in an era in which populist values are on the rise, authoritarian governance is legitimized, and core democratic tenets are regularly undermined. To combat anti-democratic outcomes and citizens’ apathy, Teaching Civic Engagement Globally provides a wide range of pedagogical tools to help the current generation learn to effectively navigate debates and lead changes in local, national, and global politics. Contributors discuss key theoretical discussions and challenges regarding global civic engagement education, highlight successful evidence-based pedagogical approaches, and review effective ways to reach across disciplines and the global education community.

  • Read more about Teaching Civic Engagement Globally.
  • About the Authors

Previous

A Compass During the Storm: Offering Students Critical Rigor for Polarizing Times

Next

A Logical Model for Predicting Minority Representation: Application to Redistricting and Voting Rights Cases

Follow Us

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Latest from APSA Journals

PS: Political Science and Politics

  • Undergraduates in New Hampshire for the First-in-the-Nation Primary

    July 1, 2022 0
    Undergraduates in New Hampshire for the First-in-the-Nation Primary By Elliott Fullmer, Randolph–Macon College In 2016 and 2020, I led travel courses to Manchester, New Hampshire, where students participated in the state’s first-in-the-nation presidential primary. For [...]
  • The Trump Effect: How 2016 Campaign Rallies Explain Spikes in Hate

    June 30, 2022 0
    The Trump Effect: How 2016 Campaign Rallies Explain Spikes in Hate By Ayal Feinberg, Texas A&M University–Commerce, Regina Branton and Valerie Martinez-Ebers, University of North Texas The 2016 Trump campaign held more than 300 rallies. [...]
  • Teaching the Hidden Curriculum in Political Science

    June 29, 2022 0
    Teaching the Hidden Curriculum in Political Science By Elena Barham and Colleen Wood, Columbia University The “hidden curriculum” in academia represents a set of informal norms and rules, expectations, and skills that inform our “ways [...]

Recent Posts

  • Undergraduates in New Hampshire for the First-in-the-Nation Primary
  • Meet DFP Spring Fellow, Laura Uribe, University of California, San Diego
  • Theme Panel: Considering the Place of Disability in Political Science in the Wake of COVID-19

Copyright © I American Political Science Association

 

Loading Comments...