• Home
    • APSA Public Statements
    • 2024 US Elections
    • APSA Annual Meeting
    • APSA Website
  • Journals
    • APSR
    • PS: Political Science & Politics
    • Perspectives on Politics
    • Journal of Political Science Education
    • Political Science Today
    • Public Scholars
    • Cambridge University Press
    • All Journals
  • Awards
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Centennial Center
    • Grants
  • People
    • Political Science Scholars
    • Career Paths
    • Member Spotlight ★
    • Obituaries
  • Diversity & Inclusion
    • APSA Oral History Project
    • Ralph Bunche Summer Institute
    • Diversity Fellowship Program
    • Fund for Latino Scholarship
    • First-Generation Scholars
  • Teaching
    • APSA Educate
    • Teaching Conference
    • Webinars
    • Workshops
    • Public Engagement
  • Tell Us Your Story!
Latest News
  • [ October 27, 2026 ] Dr. Michael Paarlberg receives the 2026 Adaljiza Sosa-Riddell Mentor Award for Mentoring of Undergraduates Adaljiza Sosa-Riddell Mentor Award
  • [ October 27, 2026 ] Meet the 2026 APSA Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grantees Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grant
  • [ October 27, 2026 ] Great Power Cyberpolitics and Global Cyberhegemony Journals
  • [ October 26, 2026 ] APSA Announces the 2026 Sosa-Riddell Mentor Award Recipients Adaljiza Sosa-Riddell Mentor Award
  • [ October 26, 2026 ] Film-Making the Nation Great Again: Audio-visualizing History in the Authoritarian Toolkit Journals
  • [ October 23, 2026 ] Yujin Julia Jung Receives the 2026 Michael Brintnall Teaching and Learning Award Annual Meeting Awards
HomeTeachingChapter 4: Conceptualizing Civic Education and Engagement in Less Liberal Contexts

Chapter 4: Conceptualizing Civic Education and Engagement in Less Liberal Contexts

November 26, 2021 Teaching, Teaching and Learning, Teaching Civic Engagement Comments Off on Chapter 4: Conceptualizing Civic Education and Engagement in Less Liberal Contexts
Teaching Civic Engagement Globally is the result of collaborative work spanning scholars from multiple disciplines, fields, and careers. Political scientists, educators, and students have joined to produce important, timely research.

Chapter 4: Conceptualizing Civic Education and Engagement in Less Liberal Contexts

by Catherine Shea Sanger, Yale-NUS College, Singapore, and Wei Lit Yew, Hong Kong Baptist University

Civic engagement education has often been associated with promoting and protecting liberal democracy. What does civic engagement education entail in less liberal or illiberal political contexts? In our contributions, we describe ways that broader political-legal contexts of the state and nation, organizational contexts of universities or colleges, and localized settings within the college, e.g., residential halls and classrooms (microclimates) combine to facilitate or stymie civic engagement education. Using Singapore as an illustration, we describe formal legal restrictions and implicit norms that constitute barriers to certain types of civic engagement.

To foster productive microclimates for civic education in this context, we encourage educators to emphasize community engagement in addition to political activism, inquiry and service over confrontational change-making, and communitarian/ collectivist over exclusively liberal/individualized political approaches. To develop these claims, we introduce a case study of Yale-NUS College in Singapore.

Our case study indicates that, through the provision of a facilitative campus climate, there are robust opportunities for civic engagement education in less liberal contexts. Our findings indicate that that the liberal arts and sciences common curriculum, active learning pedagogies, intimacy and multinationalism of the college community, support for student initiatives, and can-do culture of Yale-NUS have combined to nourish vibrant spaces for student civic engagement. However, there remain barriers to civic engagement. These include students’ workload and major selection, perceived liberal bias in the college, national political regulations, and the intimacy of the college community, which can be a double-edged sword. relations to empower the voices of many.

Read the full chapter here.


About Teaching Civic Engagement Globally
Educators around the globe are facing challenges in teaching politics in an era in which populist values are on the rise, authoritarian governance is legitimized, and core democratic tenets are regularly undermined. To combat anti-democratic outcomes and citizens’ apathy, Teaching Civic Engagement Globally provides a wide range of pedagogical tools to help the current generation learn to effectively navigate debates and lead changes in local, national, and global politics. Contributors discuss key theoretical discussions and challenges regarding global civic engagement education, highlight successful evidence-based pedagogical approaches, and review effective ways to reach across disciplines and the global education community.

  • Read more about Teaching Civic Engagement Globally.
  • About the Authors

Previous

A Compass During the Storm: Offering Students Critical Rigor for Polarizing Times

Next

A Logical Model for Predicting Minority Representation: Application to Redistricting and Voting Rights Cases

Follow Us

  • X
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Recent Posts

  • Dr. Michael Paarlberg receives the 2026 Adaljiza Sosa-Riddell Mentor Award for Mentoring of Undergraduates
  • Meet the 2026 APSA Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grantees
  • Great Power Cyberpolitics and Global Cyberhegemony
  • APSA Announces the 2026 Sosa-Riddell Mentor Award Recipients
  • Film-Making the Nation Great Again: Audio-visualizing History in the Authoritarian Toolkit
  • Yujin Julia Jung Receives the 2026 Michael Brintnall Teaching and Learning Award
  • Off-Balance: How US Courts Privilege Conservative Policy Outcomes
  • Join Friday Faculty Hours: A Forum for Political Science Community College Instructors | Friday, October 30, 2026 
  • Right to Work or Right to Vote? Labor Policy and American Democracy
  • The Safety Net and the Gig Economy: Policy Attitudes and Political Participation
  • The Future as a Democratic Resource
  • Announcing Call for Editors: American Political Science Review (APSR)

Journals

  • Great Power Cyberpolitics and Global Cyberhegemony

    October 27, 2026 0
    Great Power Cyberpolitics and Global Cyberhegemony By Yavuz Akdağ As interstate cyberconflict intensifies, the intersection of national security, cybersecurity, and International Relations (IR) theory has emerged as a critical venue for scholarly inquiry. Yet due [...]
  • Film-Making the Nation Great Again: Audio-visualizing History in the Authoritarian Toolkit

    October 26, 2026 0
    Film-Making the Nation Great Again: Audio-visualizing History in the Authoritarian Toolkit By Lisel Hintz and Jonas Bergan Draege How can populist authoritarian incumbents justify remaining in power when the golden age they promised remains unrealized? [...]
  • Off-Balance: How US Courts Privilege Conservative Policy Outcomes

    October 23, 2026 0
    Off-Balance: How US Courts Privilege Conservative Policy Outcomes By Brian Highsmith, Maya Sen and Kathleen Thelen A growing literature has challenged some of the more influential accounts regarding the role of courts in the development [...]

Copyright © I American Political Science Association

360640706
Loading Comments...