• Home
    • APSA Public Statements
    • 2024 US Elections
    • APSA Annual Meeting
    • APSA Website
  • Journals
    • American Political Science Review
    • PS: Political Science & Politics
    • Perspectives on Politics
    • Journal of Political Science Education
    • Political Science Today
    • Public Scholars
    • Cambridge University Press
    • All Journals
  • Awards
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Centennial Center
    • Grants
  • People
    • Political Science Scholars
    • Career Paths
    • Member Spotlight ★
    • Obituaries
  • Diversity & Inclusion
    • APSA Oral History Project
    • Ralph Bunche Summer Institute
    • Diversity Fellowship Program
    • Fund for Latino Scholarship
    • First-Generation Scholars
  • Teaching
    • APSA Educate
    • Teaching Conference
    • Webinars
    • Workshops
    • Public Engagement
  • Tell Us Your Story!
Latest News
  • [ June 8, 2026 ] 2026 Short Course Highlight: Causal Inference with Observational Data APSA Annual Meeting
  • [ June 8, 2026 ] Meet DFP Spring Fellow, Elina Rodriguez, University of California, Berkeley Diversity Fellowship Program
  • [ June 5, 2026 ] 2026 Short Course: How to Use NVivo for Qualitative Data Analysis APSA Annual Meeting
  • [ June 5, 2026 ] Meet DFP Spring Fellow, Eman Alahmadi, The University of Texas at Austin Diversity Fellowship Program
  • [ June 4, 2026 ] 2026 Short Course: Comparative Historical Analysis APSA Annual Meeting
  • [ June 4, 2026 ] Meet DFP Spring Fellow, Emily Martinez, University of Wisconsin-Madison Diversity Fellowship Program
HomeTeachingChapter 3: Importing Civic Education into Authoritarian China

Chapter 3: Importing Civic Education into Authoritarian China

November 23, 2021 Teaching, Teaching and Learning, Teaching Civic Engagement Comments Off on Chapter 3: Importing Civic Education into Authoritarian China
Now Available! An APSA new publication, Teaching Civic Engagement Globally, is the result of collaborative work spanning scholars from multiple disciplines, fields, and careers. Political scientists, educators, and students have joined to produce important, timely research.

Chapter 3: Importing Civic Education into Authoritarian China

by Taiyi Sun, Christopher Newport University

While teaching civic engagement is intrinsically suitable to democratic regimes and their norms, similar curricula could face tremendous obstacles when being taught in authoritarian countries. How could we teach civic engagement in authoritarian states? This chapter discusses the “imported model” by analyzing the experiences of implanting civic education pedagogy into mainland China. The case study of SEED for Social Innovation – an NGO the author co-founded in 2012 – that first brought Chinese trainees to the U.S. and then subsequently took the curricula to China, is utilized to capture the importing process. Quasi-experimental data comparing the effects of teaching the curriculum in the U.S. and China measuring trust, norms of reciprocity, and willingness for civic engagement is also analyzed.

This chapter argues that when faced with institutional constraints in authoritarian countries, one could still successfully teach civic engagement by training individuals who are grounded in their own cultures and are willing to travel to study civic educations and the pedagogy in democratic cultures.

Using these individuals as anchors and through turning the trainees into trainers, successful pedagogical models of civic engagement could be grounded even within an authoritarian context. Framing “teaching civic engagement” as academic activities while collaborating with prestigious educational institutions would provide legitimacy and reduce political risk; collaborating with domestic foundations and philanthropists could make the imported model more sustainable economically; assembling local civic engagement best practices could further localize the foreign experiences. The experimental data assessing participants’ willingness to civically engage also reveals that the interventions have as much impact in the workshops conducted in China as those in the U.S.

Read the full chapter here.


About Teaching Civic Engagement Globally
Educators around the globe are facing challenges in teaching politics in an era in which populist values are on the rise, authoritarian governance is legitimized, and core democratic tenets are regularly undermined. To combat anti-democratic outcomes and citizens’ apathy, Teaching Civic Engagement Globally provides a wide range of pedagogical tools to help the current generation learn to effectively navigate debates and lead changes in local, national, and global politics. Contributors discuss key theoretical discussions and challenges regarding global civic engagement education, highlight successful evidence-based pedagogical approaches, and review effective ways to reach across disciplines and the global education community.

  • Read more about Teaching Civic Engagement Globally.
  • About the Authors

Previous

Does Expert Opinion Matter to Politicians? It Does, Even When It Goes Against Their Preferences

Next

Meet the 2022-2026 Editorial Team for PS: Political Science & Politics 

Follow Us

  • X
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Recent Posts

  • 2026 Short Course Highlight: Causal Inference with Observational Data
  • Meet DFP Spring Fellow, Elina Rodriguez, University of California, Berkeley
  • 2026 Short Course: How to Use NVivo for Qualitative Data Analysis
  • Meet DFP Spring Fellow, Eman Alahmadi, The University of Texas at Austin
  • 2026 Short Course: Comparative Historical Analysis

Journals

  • Could Slave Raids Have Strengthened States? Evidence from Eastern Europe

    June 3, 2026 0
    In the APSA Public Scholarship Program, graduate students in political science produce summaries of new research in the American Political Science Review. This piece, written by Deborah Saki, covers the new article by Volha Charnysh [...]
  • Criminal Communication: Public Representations, Repertoires, and Regimes of Criminal Governance

    May 12, 2026 0
    Criminal Communication: Public Representations, Repertoires, and Regimes of Criminal Governance By Philip Luke Johnson, Flinders University Criminal actors are widely assumed to maintain a low profile, exerting power through coercion and clandestine networks. Scholarship addressing [...]
  • Bent into Submission? Domestic Investors and Populist Governments

    May 11, 2026 0
    Bent into Submission? Domestic Investors and Populist Governments By Alison L. Johnston, Oregon State University and Juliet Johnson, McGill University Do populist governments bend their economic policies to the preferences of bondholders? Populist governments should [...]

Copyright © I American Political Science Association

360640706

Loading Comments...