• Home
    • APSA Public Statements
    • 2024 US Elections
    • APSA Annual Meeting
    • APSA Website
  • Journals
    • American Political Science Review
    • PS: Political Science & Politics
    • Perspectives on Politics
    • Journal of Political Science Education
    • Political Science Today
    • Public Scholars
    • Cambridge University Press
    • All Journals
  • Awards
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Centennial Center
    • Grants
  • People
    • Political Science Scholars
    • Career Paths
    • Member Spotlight ★
    • Obituaries
  • Diversity & Inclusion
    • APSA Oral History Project
    • Ralph Bunche Summer Institute
    • Diversity Fellowship Program
    • Fund for Latino Scholarship
    • First-Generation Scholars
  • Teaching
    • APSA Educate
    • Teaching Conference
    • Webinars
    • Workshops
    • Public Engagement
  • Tell Us Your Story!
Latest News
  • [ May 19, 2026 ] Making the Founding Documents Relevant in the 21st Century: APSA’s Engaging America’s 250th Webinar Series America 250th
  • [ May 19, 2026 ] Meet DFP Spring Fellow, Sashi Juarez-Galindo, University of Maryland, College Park Diversity Fellowship Program
  • [ May 18, 2026 ] APSA Statement on the Dismissal of the National Science Board Funding
  • [ May 18, 2026 ] Meet DFP Spring Fellow, Taylor Gibson Campbell, Temple University Diversity Fellowship Program
  • [ May 15, 2026 ] Meet DFP Spring Fellow, Yasir Kuoti, Boston University Diversity Fellowship Program
  • [ May 14, 2026 ] How Confederate Monuments Shaped Violence in America American Political Science Review
HomeTeachingChapter 3: Importing Civic Education into Authoritarian China

Chapter 3: Importing Civic Education into Authoritarian China

November 23, 2021 Teaching, Teaching and Learning, Teaching Civic Engagement Comments Off on Chapter 3: Importing Civic Education into Authoritarian China
Now Available! An APSA new publication, Teaching Civic Engagement Globally, is the result of collaborative work spanning scholars from multiple disciplines, fields, and careers. Political scientists, educators, and students have joined to produce important, timely research.

Chapter 3: Importing Civic Education into Authoritarian China

by Taiyi Sun, Christopher Newport University

While teaching civic engagement is intrinsically suitable to democratic regimes and their norms, similar curricula could face tremendous obstacles when being taught in authoritarian countries. How could we teach civic engagement in authoritarian states? This chapter discusses the “imported model” by analyzing the experiences of implanting civic education pedagogy into mainland China. The case study of SEED for Social Innovation – an NGO the author co-founded in 2012 – that first brought Chinese trainees to the U.S. and then subsequently took the curricula to China, is utilized to capture the importing process. Quasi-experimental data comparing the effects of teaching the curriculum in the U.S. and China measuring trust, norms of reciprocity, and willingness for civic engagement is also analyzed.

This chapter argues that when faced with institutional constraints in authoritarian countries, one could still successfully teach civic engagement by training individuals who are grounded in their own cultures and are willing to travel to study civic educations and the pedagogy in democratic cultures.

Using these individuals as anchors and through turning the trainees into trainers, successful pedagogical models of civic engagement could be grounded even within an authoritarian context. Framing “teaching civic engagement” as academic activities while collaborating with prestigious educational institutions would provide legitimacy and reduce political risk; collaborating with domestic foundations and philanthropists could make the imported model more sustainable economically; assembling local civic engagement best practices could further localize the foreign experiences. The experimental data assessing participants’ willingness to civically engage also reveals that the interventions have as much impact in the workshops conducted in China as those in the U.S.

Read the full chapter here.


About Teaching Civic Engagement Globally
Educators around the globe are facing challenges in teaching politics in an era in which populist values are on the rise, authoritarian governance is legitimized, and core democratic tenets are regularly undermined. To combat anti-democratic outcomes and citizens’ apathy, Teaching Civic Engagement Globally provides a wide range of pedagogical tools to help the current generation learn to effectively navigate debates and lead changes in local, national, and global politics. Contributors discuss key theoretical discussions and challenges regarding global civic engagement education, highlight successful evidence-based pedagogical approaches, and review effective ways to reach across disciplines and the global education community.

  • Read more about Teaching Civic Engagement Globally.
  • About the Authors

Previous

Does Expert Opinion Matter to Politicians? It Does, Even When It Goes Against Their Preferences

Next

Meet the 2022-2026 Editorial Team for PS: Political Science & Politics 

Follow Us

  • X
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Recent Posts

  • Making the Founding Documents Relevant in the 21st Century: APSA’s Engaging America’s 250th Webinar Series
  • Meet DFP Spring Fellow, Sashi Juarez-Galindo, University of Maryland, College Park
  • APSA Statement on the Dismissal of the National Science Board
  • Meet DFP Spring Fellow, Taylor Gibson Campbell, Temple University
  • Meet DFP Spring Fellow, Yasir Kuoti, Boston University

Journals

  • Criminal Communication: Public Representations, Repertoires, and Regimes of Criminal Governance

    May 12, 2026 0
    Criminal Communication: Public Representations, Repertoires, and Regimes of Criminal Governance By Philip Luke Johnson, Flinders University Criminal actors are widely assumed to maintain a low profile, exerting power through coercion and clandestine networks. Scholarship addressing [...]
  • Bent into Submission? Domestic Investors and Populist Governments

    May 11, 2026 0
    Bent into Submission? Domestic Investors and Populist Governments By Alison L. Johnston, Oregon State University and Juliet Johnson, McGill University Do populist governments bend their economic policies to the preferences of bondholders? Populist governments should [...]
  • Political Symbols and Social Order: Confederate Monuments and Performative Violence in the Post-Reconstruction U.S. South

    May 8, 2026 0
    Political Symbols and Social Order: Confederate Monuments and Performative Violence in the Post-Reconstruction U.S. South By Lee-Or Ankori-Karlinsky, Brown University Violent conflicts are often accompanied by symbols commemorating past violence. I argue that political symbols [...]

Copyright © I American Political Science Association

360640706

Loading Comments...