• Home
  • Journals
    • American Political Science Review
    • Perspectives on Politics
    • PS: Political Science & Politics
    • Journal of Political Science Education
    • All Journals
  • Awards
  • Career Paths
  • People
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Teaching
    • APSA Educate
  • Tell Us Your Story!
News
  • [ May 27, 2022 ] Introduction to A Dialogue on the Status of Junior Women of Color in the Discipline Journals
  • [ May 27, 2022 ] Short Course: Learning for Democracy: Lessons in Power and Persuasion Annual Conference
  • [ May 26, 2022 ] Learning to Dislike Your Opponents: Political Socialization in the Era of Polarization APSR
HomeTeachingChapter 3: Importing Civic Education into Authoritarian China

Chapter 3: Importing Civic Education into Authoritarian China

November 23, 2021 Teaching, Teaching and Learning, Teaching Civic Engagement Comments Off on Chapter 3: Importing Civic Education into Authoritarian China
Now Available! An APSA new publication, Teaching Civic Engagement Globally, is the result of collaborative work spanning scholars from multiple disciplines, fields, and careers. Political scientists, educators, and students have joined to produce important, timely research.

Chapter 3: Importing Civic Education into Authoritarian China

by Taiyi Sun, Christopher Newport University

While teaching civic engagement is intrinsically suitable to democratic regimes and their norms, similar curricula could face tremendous obstacles when being taught in authoritarian countries. How could we teach civic engagement in authoritarian states? This chapter discusses the “imported model” by analyzing the experiences of implanting civic education pedagogy into mainland China. The case study of SEED for Social Innovation – an NGO the author co-founded in 2012 – that first brought Chinese trainees to the U.S. and then subsequently took the curricula to China, is utilized to capture the importing process. Quasi-experimental data comparing the effects of teaching the curriculum in the U.S. and China measuring trust, norms of reciprocity, and willingness for civic engagement is also analyzed.

This chapter argues that when faced with institutional constraints in authoritarian countries, one could still successfully teach civic engagement by training individuals who are grounded in their own cultures and are willing to travel to study civic educations and the pedagogy in democratic cultures.

Using these individuals as anchors and through turning the trainees into trainers, successful pedagogical models of civic engagement could be grounded even within an authoritarian context. Framing “teaching civic engagement” as academic activities while collaborating with prestigious educational institutions would provide legitimacy and reduce political risk; collaborating with domestic foundations and philanthropists could make the imported model more sustainable economically; assembling local civic engagement best practices could further localize the foreign experiences. The experimental data assessing participants’ willingness to civically engage also reveals that the interventions have as much impact in the workshops conducted in China as those in the U.S.

Read the full chapter here.


About Teaching Civic Engagement Globally
Educators around the globe are facing challenges in teaching politics in an era in which populist values are on the rise, authoritarian governance is legitimized, and core democratic tenets are regularly undermined. To combat anti-democratic outcomes and citizens’ apathy, Teaching Civic Engagement Globally provides a wide range of pedagogical tools to help the current generation learn to effectively navigate debates and lead changes in local, national, and global politics. Contributors discuss key theoretical discussions and challenges regarding global civic engagement education, highlight successful evidence-based pedagogical approaches, and review effective ways to reach across disciplines and the global education community.

  • Read more about Teaching Civic Engagement Globally.
  • About the Authors

Previous

Does Expert Opinion Matter to Politicians? It Does, Even When It Goes Against Their Preferences

Next

Meet the 2022-2026 Editorial Team for PS: Political Science & Politics 

Follow Us

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Latest from APSA Journals

PS: Political Science and Politics

  • Introduction to A Dialogue on the Status of Junior Women of Color in the Discipline

    May 27, 2022 0
    Introduction to A Dialogue on the Status of Junior Women of Color in the Discipline By Jenn M. Jackson, Syracuse University,  Melina Juárez Pérez, Western Washington University, Jamil Scott, Georgetown University and Diane Wong, Rutgers [...]
  • Improving Open-Source Information on African Politics, One Student at a Time

    May 24, 2022 0
    Improving Open-Source Information on African Politics, One Student at a Time By Martha Wilfahrt, University of California, Berkeley and Kristin Michelitch, Vanderbilt University This article discusses Wikipedia page creation as a fruitful assignment for undergraduate [...]
  • Here Comes Everybody: Using a Data Cooperative to Understand the New Dynamics of Representation

    May 23, 2022 0
    Here Comes Everybody: Using a Data Cooperative to Understand the New Dynamics of Representation By Paru R. Shah, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Eric Gonzalez Juenke, Michigan State University, and Bernard L. Fraga, Emory University While [...]

Recent Posts

  • Introduction to A Dialogue on the Status of Junior Women of Color in the Discipline
  • Short Course: Learning for Democracy: Lessons in Power and Persuasion
  • Learning to Dislike Your Opponents: Political Socialization in the Era of Polarization

Copyright © I American Political Science Association

 

Loading Comments...