Raising the Stakes on a Political Science Major Field Test: Evidence From a New Capstone Course

Raising the Stakes on a Political Science Major Field Test: Evidence From a New Capstone Course

By John LaForest Phillips, Austin Peay State University

Using a major field test (MFT) is a common method of program assessment. For accurate assessment to take place, however, students must be sufficiently motivated to perform. This paper studies a change in major requirements that associated a major field test to a grade in a political science capstone course. After controlling for possible confounders like Gender, Age, Ethnicity, and differences in GPA and ACT scores, a modest but statistically significant treatment effect was found. However, the fit between a student’s program GPA and MFT scores did not improve, leading to questions about how best to assess political science knowledge for program graduates.

Read more.


The Journal of Political Science Education is an intellectually rigorous, path-breaking, agenda-setting journal that publishes the highest quality scholarship on teaching and pedagogical issues in political science. The journal aims to represent the full range of questions, issues and approaches regarding political science education, including teaching-related issues, methods and techniques, learning/teaching activities and devices, educational assessment in political science, graduate education, and curriculum development.