Pandemic Politics: Timing State-Level Social Distancing Responses to COVID-19

Pandemic Politics: Timing State-Level Social Distancing Responses to COVID-19

Christopher Adolph, University of Washington
Kenya Amano, University of Washington
Bree Bang-Jensen, University of Washington
Nancy Fullman, University of Washington
John Wilkerson, University of Washington

Social distancing policies are critical but economically painful measures to flatten the curve against emergent infectious diseases. As the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19 spread throughout the United States in early 2020, the federal government issued social distancing recommendations but left to the states the most difficult and consequential decisions restricting behavior, such as canceling events, closing schools and businesses, and issuing stay-at-home orders. We present an original dataset of state-level social distancing policy responses to the epidemic and explore how political partisanship, COVID-19 caseload, and policy diffusion explain the timing of governors’ decisions to mandate social distancing. An event history analysis of five social distancing policies across all fifty states reveals the most important predictors are political: all else equal, Republican governors and governors from states with more Trump supporters were slower to adopt social distancing policies. These delays are likely to produce significant, on-going harm to public health.

Access the paper here.

APSA Preprints is a free-to-access prepublication platform dedicated to early research outputs in political science and related disciplines. It has been developed through a collaboration of the American Political Science Association and Cambridge University Press.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.