• Home
  • Journals
    • American Political Science Review
    • Perspectives on Politics
    • PS: Political Science & Politics
    • Journal of Political Science Education
    • All Journals
  • Awards
  • Career Paths
  • People
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Teaching
    • APSA Educate
  • Tell Us Your Story!
News
  • [ May 19, 2022 ] Can Theatre Disrupt Biases in the US? Civic Education
  • [ May 19, 2022 ] Evaluating Muslim American Representation Journals
  • [ May 19, 2022 ] Meet 2022 RBSI Scholar, William Taylor, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
HomeAPSRPlatonic Theocracy, Liberalism, and Authoritarianism in Leo Strauss’s Philosophy and Law

Platonic Theocracy, Liberalism, and Authoritarianism in Leo Strauss’s Philosophy and Law

February 10, 2021 APSR, Democracy, Journals, Public Engagement Comments Off on Platonic Theocracy, Liberalism, and Authoritarianism in Leo Strauss’s Philosophy and Law

Platonic Theocracy, Liberalism, and Authoritarianism in Leo Strauss’s Philosophy and Law

By John P. Mccormick, University of Chicago

Leo Strauss, in Philosophy and Law (1935), offers Platonic theocracy as a more just and stable political alternative to both liberalism and authoritarianism. Rather than merely a scholastic investigation of medieval Jewish and Islamic philosophy, I read the book as a programmatic endorsement of a morally perfectionist political order: a divinely legitimated and rationally justified “true” or “beautiful” state. Since human beings require political community to suppress their evil inclinations and promote their disposition toward the good, Strauss criticizes liberalism for contending that government should remain neutral regarding good and evil and modern authoritarianism for effectively committing idolatry by politically instrumentalizing theology. I demonstrate that Strauss’s long-neglected book is particularly relevant for our own “postsecular age,” an age when adherents of religious orthodoxy increasingly demand concessions from liberal democracies and resurgent state authoritarianism frequently cloaks itself in religious trappings.

  • Read the full article.
  • American Political Science Review 

Previous

Meet Andrew Marshall, 2020 APSA Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grantee

Next

Meet Andra Pascu, 2020 APSA Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grantee

Follow Us

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Latest from APSA Journals

PS: Political Science and Politics

  • Evaluating Muslim American Representation

    May 19, 2022 0
    Evaluating Muslim American Representation By Nazita Lajevardi, Michigan State University and Liesel Spangler, Independent Scholar There is growing concern about the status of Muslims in the United States today. Anti-Muslim attitudes are pervasive (Kalkan, Layman, [...]
  • Creditable Civic Engagement? Aligning Work on Civic Activity with Faculty Incentives

    May 18, 2022 0
    Creditable Civic Engagement? Aligning Work on Civic Activity with Faculty Incentives By Kenneth W. Moffett and Laurie L. Rice, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Less than two years into our time as assistant professors, our university’s [...]
  • Creating “Civic Sense”: Implementing Civic Engagement Courses in All Disciplines

    May 17, 2022 0
    Creating “Civic Sense”: Implementing Civic Engagement Courses in All Disciplines By Connie Jorgensen, Piedmont Virginia Community College In August 2020, Piedmont Virginia Community College (PVCC), a small community college in Charlottesville, Virginia, launched a five-year [...]

Recent Posts

  • Can Theatre Disrupt Biases in the US?
  • Evaluating Muslim American Representation
  • Meet 2022 RBSI Scholar, William Taylor, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Copyright © I American Political Science Association

 

Loading Comments...